Key Concepts¶
This page introduces the fundamental concepts used throughout the RWA calculator. Understanding these terms is essential for working with the system effectively.
Risk-Weighted Assets (RWA)¶
Risk-Weighted Assets (RWA) are a measure of a bank's assets, adjusted for risk. They are used to determine the minimum capital a bank must hold to remain solvent.
The higher the risk of an asset, the higher its risk weight, and the more capital required.
Example¶
| Asset | Value | Risk Weight | RWA |
|---|---|---|---|
| UK Government Bond | £100m | 0% | £0m |
| Corporate Loan (AAA) | £100m | 20% | £20m |
| Corporate Loan (Unrated) | £100m | 100% | £100m |
Regulatory Frameworks¶
CRR (Capital Requirements Regulation)¶
The CRR implements Basel 3.0 standards in the UK. It is the current regulatory framework, effective until 31 December 2026.
Key features: - 1.06 scaling factor for IRB approaches - SME Supporting Factor (Article 501) - Infrastructure Supporting Factor - No output floor
Basel 3.1¶
Basel 3.1 (implemented via PRA PS1/26) introduces enhanced risk sensitivity and removes certain capital relief mechanisms. Effective from 1 January 2027.
Key features: - Removal of 1.06 scaling factor - Removal of supporting factors - Introduction of 72.5% output floor - Differentiated PD floors - A-IRB LGD floors
Calculation Approaches¶
The calculator supports four approaches, each with increasing risk sensitivity:
| Approach | Key Feature | Who Estimates Risk? |
|---|---|---|
| Standardised (SA) | Regulatory-prescribed risk weights based on ratings | Regulator |
| Foundation IRB (F-IRB) | Bank estimates PD; supervisory LGD/EAD | Bank + Regulator |
| Advanced IRB (A-IRB) | Bank estimates PD, LGD, and EAD | Bank |
| Slotting | Category-based (Strong/Good/Satisfactory/Weak/Default) for specialised lending | Regulator |
Details: See Standardised Approach, IRB Approach, and Specialised Lending for formulas, parameters, and worked examples.
Exposure Classes¶
Exposures are classified into regulatory categories based on the counterparty's entity type:
| Class | Description | Typical Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Central Govt / Central Bank | Governments and central banks | Low-High |
| RGLA | Regional governments, local authorities | Low-Medium |
| PSE | Public sector entities | Low-Medium |
| MDB | Multilateral development banks | Low |
| Institution | Banks, CCPs, financial institutions | Medium |
| Corporate | Non-retail companies | Medium-High |
| Corporate SME | Small/medium enterprises (turnover ≤ EUR 50m under CRR; ≤ GBP 44m under Basel 3.1) | Medium |
| Retail Mortgage | Residential mortgages | Low-Medium |
| Retail QRRE | Qualifying revolving retail | Medium |
| Retail Other | Other retail exposures | Medium-High |
| Specialised Lending | Project finance, object finance, IPRE | Variable |
| Equity | Equity holdings | High |
| Defaulted | Non-performing exposures | Very High |
Entity Type Classification¶
The counterparty's entity_type field is the single source of truth for exposure class determination. The calculator supports 17 entity types that map to both SA and IRB exposure classes.
For example:
- pse_sovereign maps to PSE for SA (uses PSE risk weight table) but CENTRAL_GOVT_CENTRAL_BANK for IRB (uses central govt/central bank formula)
- mdb maps to MDB for SA (typically 0% RW) but CENTRAL_GOVT_CENTRAL_BANK for IRB
See Classification for the complete entity type mapping and classification algorithm.
Key Metrics¶
| Metric | What It Measures | Used In |
|---|---|---|
| EAD (Exposure at Default) | Expected exposure if counterparty defaults. On-balance = drawn amount; off-balance = committed × CCF | All approaches |
| PD (Probability of Default) | Likelihood of default within one year (0.03%–100%) | IRB only |
| LGD (Loss Given Default) | % of exposure lost after recoveries. Supervisory in F-IRB, bank-estimated in A-IRB | IRB only |
| CCF (Credit Conversion Factor) | Converts off-balance sheet commitments to on-balance equivalents (0%–100%) | All approaches |
Details: See the Standardised Approach and IRB Approach for full parameter tables and floor values.
Credit Risk Mitigation (CRM)¶
CRM techniques reduce the capital required for an exposure:
- Collateral — physical or financial assets securing an exposure, subject to supervisory haircuts
- Guarantees — credit protection from a third party; the guaranteed portion is treated as an exposure to the guarantor (substitution approach)
- Provisions — specific provisions reduce EAD for SA exposures or expected loss for IRB exposures
Details: See Credit Risk Mitigation for haircut tables, overcollateralisation ratios, maturity mismatch adjustments, and worked examples.
Data Hierarchy¶
Exposures follow a hierarchical structure:
graph TD
A[Counterparty] --> B[Facility]
B --> C[Loan/Draw]
A --> D[Collateral]
A --> E[Guarantee]
A --> F[Rating]
B --> G[Collateral]
C --> H[Collateral]
- Counterparty: The obligor (borrower)
- Facility: A credit arrangement (e.g., credit line)
- Loan: Individual draws or tranches
Ratings and collateral can be assigned at any level and inherit down the hierarchy.
Pipeline Stages¶
The calculation flows through six stages: Load → Hierarchy → Classify → CRM → Calculate → Aggregate.
Details: See Pipeline Architecture for the full stage-by-stage walkthrough with diagrams.
Next Steps¶
- Regulatory Frameworks - Deep dive into CRR and Basel 3.1
- Calculation Methodology - Detailed calculation explanations
- Data Model - Input and output data structures